ArticleJournal of medical genetics1992
Experience with direct molecular diagnosis of fragile X.
Article in Journal of medical genetics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome. National Fragile X Foundation.Journal of medical genetics · 1993Guideline
- EMQN best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic testing and reporting of fragile X syndrome and other fragile X-associated disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Phenotype correlation and intergenerational dynamics of the Friedreich ataxia GAA trinucleotide repeat.American journal of human genetics · 1997Article
- Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular analysis of three families with FRAXE.Journal of medical genetics · 1997Article
- Recurrent and unexpected segregation of the FMR1 CGG repeat in a family with fragile X syndrome.Human genetics · 1996Article
- Direct molecular analysis of the fragile X syndrome in a sample of Egyptian and German patients using non-radioactive PCR and Southern blot followed by chemiluminescent detection.Human genetics · 1995Article
- FRAXE and mental retardation.Journal of medical genetics · 1995Article
- Apparent regression of the CGG repeat in FMR1 to an allele of normal size.Human genetics · 1994Article
- Absence of FMR-1 gene expression can be detected with RNA extracted from dried blood specimens.Human genetics · 1994Article
- Genotype-phenotype relationships in fragile X syndrome: a family study.American journal of human genetics · 1993Article
- Molecular analysis of mutations in the gene FMR-1 segregating in fragile X families.Human genetics · 1993Article
- Between-generation differences in ascertainment and penetrance: relevance to genetic hypotheses in fragile X.Human genetics · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of the pfxa3 probe for direct molecular diagnosis of the fragile X (FRAXA) has been established. This probe detects amplification of an unstable DNA element consisting of variable length CCG repeats. The size of the amplified fragment is correlated with phenotype and was determined using PstI digested DNA in family members. In 35 families with the fragile X, there was correspondence in 183 cases between the presence of an amplified unstable element and the presence of the fragile X chromosome independently determined by cytogenetics, position in the pedigree, or linked DNA markers flanking the fragile X. There was also correspondence in 124 cases between the presence of the normal 1.0 kb PstI fragment and absence of the fragile X chromosome independently determined by linked flanking markers. Six additional families considered to be isolated cases of 'fragile X' had been diagnosed before recognition of FRAXD. The pfxa3 probe confirmed the cytogenetic diagnosis in three families, the other three being rediagnosed as non-fragile X. A further two families had consistent expression of a different folate sensitive fragile site, FRAXE, close to FRAXA but not associated with fragile X syndrome and not detectable with the pfxa3 probe. Subsequent referrals were received from additional family members or from members of new families for whom carrier status had not been predetermined by linked markers. Direct pfxa3 diagnosis for the 135 females within these 222 additional cases was confirmed by dosage analysis with the control probe pS8.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.