Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16195804›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2005

Pediatric high-grade glioma: molecular genetic clues for innovative therapeutic approaches.

Brian R Rood, Tobey J MacDonald

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Congenital glioblastoma: a clinicopathologic and genetic analysis.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian R RoodDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Center for Cancer and Immunology Research, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA. Brood@cnmc.org
Tobey J MacDonald

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High grade glioma remains the most intractable childhood tumor of the central nervous system. The molecular genetics of childhood high grade glioma remain largely unknown in comparison to that of their adult counterparts. In an era of molecularly targeted therapies, this dearth of knowledge will present particular challenges to those who must design and implement the next generation of therapeutic trials with these new agents. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of the molecular genetics of childhood high grade glioma and compare/contrast it to that of the adult tumors bearing the same classification for the purpose of beginning to identify the most promising therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Genes, NeoplasmAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsChildDNA DamageDNA RepairErbB ReceptorsGliomaHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.