Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16195797›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2005

Anti-angiogenic therapy in pediatric neuro-oncology.

Mark W Kieran

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark W KieranHarvard Medical School, USA. mark_kieran@dfci.harvard.edu
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to grow, tissues require additional nutrients and oxygen as well as removal of waste products. Tumors achieve this by up-regulating angiogenic cytokines and/or down-regulating natural inhibitory proteins that allow neovascularization to proceed. Brain tumors continue to account for significant morbidity and mortality, in spite of significant advances in neurosurgical and radiation techniques and new chemotherapy combinations. As such, there is a real and immediate need for novel biologic therapies that can target these tumors. A number of new drugs that target different aspects of the angiogenic cascade have been identified and are now in clinical trials in children with primary brain tumors. In many of these pre-clinical and clinical studies, anti-angiogenic therapy has been well tolerated, has lacked many of the traditional toxicities of radiation and chemotherapy, does not require blood-brain barrier penetration, and targets a critical pathway in central nervous system tumor development. This review will discuss what angiogenesis is, how pediatric brain tumors regulate angiogenesis to obtain a vascular supply, what types of inhibitors are available, how different classes of inhibitors work, the types of resistance possible, how rapidly these inhibitors may work, and what surrogate markers of activity are available to follow response.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsBrain NeoplasmsChildClinical Trials as TopicDown-RegulationHumansUp-RegulationAngiogenesis Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16195797
OpenAlexW2082479935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.