Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16194490›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2005

[Study of use of psychiatric drugs in primary care].

C Vedia Urgell, S Bonet Monne, C Forcada Vega, N Parellada Esquius

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chronic use of diazepam in primary healthcare centers: user profile and usage pattern.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2007
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C Vedia UrgellServei d'Atenció Primària Mataró-Maresme, ICS, Mataró, Barcelona, Spain. cvedia.bnm.ics@gencat.net
S Bonet Monne
C Forcada Vega
N Parellada Esquius

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo get to know the profile of use of antidepressants (AD) and tranquilizers-hypnotics (T-H) in primary care in Catalonia.

designTransversal, observational, epidemiological study of prescription-indication. LOCATION: Health centres in Catalonia, Spain.

participantsIncluded, using consecutive sampling, patients on treatment with AD and/or T-H. MEASUREMENTS: The variables studied were: age, sex, type and number of drugs, treatment schemes, reason for prescribing, and the health professional who initiated it.

results1613 drugs were evaluated: 43% were AD and 57% were T-H. The sub-groups most prescribed were: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) (31.6%) and short half-life (32.9%) and long half-life (19.8%) benzodiazepines (BZD). We included 998 patients, 76% of the participants were women. The average age was 52.24 years (range, 16-96). 19.9% (n=199) received treatment with AD only, 34.3% (n=342) with T-H only, and 45.8% (n=457) combined treatment. The mean number of drugs per patient was 1.6. The main reasons for prescribing were: major depression or dysthymia (60.2%; n=417) for AD and generalised anxiety (33.3%; n=306) and insomnia (23.9%; n=220) for T-H. 39.8% (n=268) of the AD and 51.0% (n=441) of T-H had been prescribed for more than 1 year.

conclusionThe described profile of the use of psychiatric drugs suggests the need to reconsider the over-prescribing of BDZ and improve coordination between psychiatrists and primary care doctors.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsPrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychotropic DrugsSex FactorsAntidepressive AgentsHypnotics and SedativesPsychotropic DrugsTranquilizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID16194490
PMCPMC7681815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.