ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2005
Global versus local adaptation in fly motion-sensitive neurons.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling of Local and Wide-Field Motion Adaptation.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Neuromodulation of insect motion vision.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Review
- Local motion adaptation enhances the representation of spatial structure at EMD arrays.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Moving sensory adaptation beyond suppressive effects in single neurons.Current biology : CB · 2014Review
- Temporal and spatial adaptation of transient responses to local features.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2012Article
- Octopaminergic modulation of contrast sensitivity.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2012Article
- Adaptation accentuates responses of fly motion-sensitive visual neurons to sudden stimulus changes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2009Article
- The motion after-effect: local and global contributions to contrast sensitivity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2009Article
- Motion adaptation enhances object-induced neural activity in three-dimensional virtual environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flies, like humans, experience a well-known consequence of adaptation to visual motion, the waterfall illusion. Direction-selective neurons in the fly lobula plate permit a detailed analysis of the mechanisms responsible for motion adaptation and their function. Most of these neurons are spatially non-opponent, they sum responses to motion in the preferred direction across their entire receptive field, and adaptation depresses responses by subtraction and by reducing contrast gain. When we adapted a small area of the receptive field to motion in its anti-preferred direction, we discovered that directional gain at unadapted regions was enhanced. This novel phenomenon shows that neuronal responses to the direction of stimulation in one area of the receptive field are dynamically adjusted to the history of stimulation both within and outside that area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.