Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16191611›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2005

Does kin selection influence fostering behaviour in Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)?

Joseph I Hoffman, William Amos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chemical fingerprints reveal clues to identity, heterozygosity, and relatedness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  6. Chemical fingerprints encode mother-offspring similarity, colony membership, relatedness, and genetic quality in fur seals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution and biodiversity of Antarctic organisms: a molecular perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph I HoffmanDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. jih24@cam.ac.uk
William Amos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent observation that female Antarctic fur seals foster pups born to related females raises the fascinating possibility that kin selection may promote altruistic behaviour even on a crowded breeding beach, where individual interactions are frequent and complex. However, the use of genetic markers to identify small numbers of unusually highly related individuals is fraught with difficulty due to the likely presence of genotyping errors and related problems. Consequently, we examined an enlarged dataset where errors had been reduced to an absolute minimum by a combination of close scrutiny and repeat genotyping. We find no support for the idea that females preferentially suckle pups born to female relatives. Instead, the previously reported pattern can be explained by a combination of genotyping errors and de novo mutations. Our study emphasizes the need for caution when interpreting rare events that occur at a rate approaching that expected for normal genotyping errors.

Indexed as

AltruismSelection, GeneticAnimalsAtlantic IslandsFemaleFur SealsGenotypeMaternal BehaviorMicrosatellite RepeatsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID16191611
PMCPMC1559908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.