SynthesisBMC genetics2005
Reconstructing recent human phylogenies with forensic STR loci: a statistical approach.
Synthesis in BMC genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A study of genomic diversity in populations of Maharashtra, India, inferred from 20 autosomal STR markers.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- Polymorphism of 11 Y Chromosome Short Tandem Repeat Markers among Malaysian Aborigines.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2017Article
- Correlation between microsatellite discrepancy scores and transplant outcome after haemopoietic SCT for pediatric ALL.Bone marrow transplantation · 2015Article
- Heterozygosity assessment of five STR loci located at 5q13 region for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy.Molecular biology reports · 2013Article
- Phylogenetic relationship analysis of Iranians and other world populations using allele frequencies at 12 polymorphic markers.Molecular biology reports · 2012Article
- Human neutral genetic variation and forensic STR data.PloS one · 2012Article
- Demographic changes and marker properties affect detection of human population differentiation.BMC genetics · 2007Article
- Genetic affinities between endogamous and inbreeding populations of Uttar Pradesh.BMC genetics · 2007Article
- High prevalence of ACE DD genotype among north Indian end stage renal disease patients.BMC nephrology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForensic Short Tandem Repeat (STR) loci are effective for the purpose of individual identification, and other forensic applications. Most of these markers have high allelic variability and mutation rate because of which they have limited use in the phylogenetic reconstruction. In the present study, we have carried out a meta-analysis to explore the possibility of using only five STR loci (TPOX, FES, vWA, F13A and Tho1) to carry out phylogenetic assessment based on the allele frequency profile of 20 world population and north Indian Hindus analyzed in the present study.
resultsPhylogenetic analysis based on two different approaches - genetic distance and maximum likelihood along with statistical bootstrapping procedure involving 1000 replicates was carried out. The ensuing tree topologies and PC plots were further compared with those obtained in earlier phylogenetic investigations. The compiled database of 21 populations got segregated and finely resolved into three basal clusters with very high bootstrap values corresponding to three geo-ethnic groups of African, Orientals, and Caucasians.
conclusionBased on this study we conclude that if appropriate and logistic statistical approaches are followed then even lesser number of forensic STR loci are powerful enough to reconstruct the recent human phylogenies despite of their relatively high mutation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.