The application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of bone tumors and tumor-like lesions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Can immunohistochemistry serve as an alternative to subjective histopathological diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia?Biomarkers in cancer · 2013
   Review
2. Dentine matrix protein 1 (DMP-1) is a marker of bone-forming tumours.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2013
   Article
3. Primary neoplasms of bones in mice: retrospective study and review of literature.Veterinary pathology · 2012
   Review
4. Orthopaedic case of the month: A 30-year-old woman with a painful forearm mass.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as