Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16189159›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2005

Cytogenetic differences in breast cancer samples between German and Japanese patients.

J Packeisen, K Nakachi, W Boecker, B Brandt, H Buerger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Array-CGH and breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J PackeisenInstitute of Pathology, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
K Nakachi
W Boecker
B Brandt
H Buerger
University of Münster · DESaitama Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJapanese and German breast cancer cases differ substantially in the frequency of egfr amplification.

aimsTo unravel further the cytogenetic differences between Japanese and German breast cancer cases.

methodsForty one Japanese breast cancer cases were evaluated by means of comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH). The results were compared with the CGH results from 161 German breast cancer cases.

resultsThe mean number of genetic alterations/case was significantly higher in German premenopausal patients with breast cancer than in their Japanese counterparts. Japanese breast cancer cases revealed a higher number of chromosome 17p losses. Losses of 8p were associated with oestrogen receptor (ER) negativity in Japanese patients with breast cancer, whereas in the German patients gains of 3q and 6q were associated with the lack of ER expression.

conclusionsThe interethnic differences of invasive breast cancer are reflected by cytogenetic aberrations, which are also associated with the differential expression of the ER.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAdultAgedAsian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGermanyHumansJapanMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasm StagingNucleic Acid HybridizationPremenopauseReceptors, EstrogenWhite PeopleNeoplasm ProteinsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID16189159
PMCPMC1770746
OpenAlexW2138000222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.