Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16189096›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Prevalence and molecular genetics of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Finland in 2002.

M Rantala, S Huikko, P Huovinen, J Jalava

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics in Public Health Pathogens.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2006
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates resistant to telithromycin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M RantalaDepartment of Bacteriology and Inflammation, National Public Health Institute, Turku, Finland. merja.rantala@ktl.fi
S Huikko
P Huovinen
J Jalava

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance among 1,007 clinical pneumococcal isolates collected in Finland were investigated. Of these, 217 (21.5%) were resistant to erythromycin and 11% to clindamycin. Among the erythromycin-resistant isolates, mef(E) was present in 95 isolates (44%), mef(A) was present in 12 isolates (6%), and erm(B) was present in 90 isolates (41%). A double mechanism, mef(E) and erm(B), was detected in five isolates (2%). Ribosomal mutation was detected in 14 (6%) macrolide-resistant isolates in which no other determinant was found. Based on the telithromycin MICs, two groups of isolates were formed: 83.3% of the isolates belonged to a major group for which the telithromycin MIC range was < or =0.008 to 0.063 microg/ml, and 16.7% belonged to a minor group for which the telithromycin MIC range was 0.125 to 8 microg/ml. All except three isolates in the minor population carried a macrolide resistance gene.

Indexed as

Molecular BiologyPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialFinlandGenes, BacterialHumansMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationRetrospective StudiesRNA, RibosomalStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID16189096
PMCPMC1251500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.