ArticleAnnals of family medicine
'Coming down the line'-- patients' understanding of their family history of common chronic disease.
Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Considering family trees as a useful tool in family medicine: a systematic review.Primary health care research & development · 2025Pooled it
- Perception of inherited risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research.British journal of cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of family history assessment on communication with family members and health care providers: A report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial (FHITr).Preventive medicine · 2015Trial
- Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2015Trial
- Family history and perceptions about risk and prevention for chronic diseases in primary care: a report from the family healthware impact trial.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2010Trial
- Realising the potential of the family history in risk assessment and primary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: ADDFAM study protocol.BMC health services research · 2009Trial
- Chest Pain, Family History, and Surgery: A Qualitative Interview Study of Cholecystectomy Patients.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- Hormones and thrombosis: the dark side of the moon.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2024Review
- No prediction without prevention: A global qualitative study of attitudes toward using a prediction tool for risk of developing depression during adolescence.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics of probands with obsessive-compulsive disorder from simplex and multiplex families.Psychiatry research · 2024Article
- Advancing the communication of genetic risk for cardiometabolic diseases: a critical interpretive synthesis.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Role of older generations in the family's adjustment to Huntington disease.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Motivating Mexican American adults to share family history with healthcare providers.Preventive medicine reports · 2021Article
- Motivations to exercise in young men following a residential weight loss programme conducted in National Service - a mixed methods study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Prevalence and Correlates of Family Cancer History Knowledge and Communication Among US Adults.Preventing chronic disease · 2020Article
- Heritability for stroke: Essential for taking family history.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2020Review
- All things considered, my risk for diabetes is medium: A risk personalization process of familial risk for type 2 diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Evaluating the role of FAMIly history of cancer and diagnosis of multiple neoplasms in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: the multicenter FAMI-L1 study.Oncoimmunology · 2020Article
- Family Relationships Associated With Communication and Testing for Inherited Cardiac Conditions.Western journal of nursing research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe family history is becoming an increasingly important feature of health promotion and early detection of common chronic diseases in primary care. Previous studies of patients from genetics clinics suggest a divergence between how persons with a family history perceive and understand their risk and the risk information provided by health professionals. This interview study aimed to explore how patients in primary care understand and come to terms with their family history of cancer, heart disease, or diabetes and how family history might affect consultations about disease risk and management.
methodsThirty semistructured interviews were conducted with general practice patients who had a family history of cancer, heart disease, or diabetes. The transcript data underwent a qualitative constant comparative analysis.
resultsWhat exactly constitutes having a family history of an illness varied among participants. The development of a personal sense of vulnerability to the illness in the family depended not only on the biomedical approach of counting affected relatives but also on a sophisticated interplay of other factors. The emotional impact of witnessing the illness in the family, particularly if the illness was sudden, premature, or fatal, and the nature of personal relationships within a family that determine a sense of emotional closeness and personal likeness with the affected relative, all contributed to the perception of disease risk. Different beliefs about the contributions of nature and nurture to disease can affect patients' views on the degree of control they can exert over their risk.
conclusionThis study highlights potential differences between the way patients and medical professionals assess and understand familial risk of cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. Our previous systematic review findings are enhanced by showing that personal experience of disease and the emotional impact can also influence familial risk perceptions. Eliciting the patient's perspective when discussing risk of chronic disease, particularly in the context of a family history, could inform a more patient-centered approach to risk assessment and communication and support patients to make informed decisions about the management of their disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.