Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16188975›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

ADP-ribose-1"-monophosphatase: a conserved coronavirus enzyme that is dispensable for viral replication in tissue culture.

Akos Putics, Witold Filipowicz, Jonathan Hall, Alexander E Gorbalenya, John Ziebuhr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. IFN-bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mutation of a highly conserved isoleucine residue in loop 2 of severalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. PARP14 is a writer, reader, and eraser of mono-ADP-ribosylation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023
    Article
  10. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 is required for IFN antagonism and efficient virus replication in cell culture and in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Classification, replication, and transcription ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Immunoinformatics approach of epitope prediction for SARS-CoV-2.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Akos PuticsInstitute of Virology and Immunology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Witold Filipowicz
Jonathan Hall
Alexander E Gorbalenya
John Ziebuhr
University of Würzburg · DEFriedrich Miescher Institute · CHLeiden University Medical Center · NLNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication of the approximately 30-kb plus-strand RNA genome of coronaviruses and synthesis of an extensive set of subgenome-length RNAs are mediated by the replicase-transcriptase, a membrane-bound protein complex containing several cellular proteins and up to 16 viral nonstructural proteins (nsps) with multiple enzymatic activities, including protease, polymerase, helicase, methyltransferase, and RNase activities. To get further insight into the replicase gene-encoded functions, we characterized the coronavirus X domain, which is part of nsp3 and has been predicted to be an ADP-ribose-1"-monophosphate (Appr-1"-p) processing enzyme. Bacterially expressed forms of human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) and severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus X domains were shown to dephosphorylate Appr-1"-p, a side product of cellular tRNA splicing, to ADP-ribose in a highly specific manner. The enzyme had no detectable activity on several other nucleoside phosphates. Guided by the crystal structure of AF1521, an X domain homolog from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, potential active-site residues of the HCoV-229E X domain were targeted by site-directed mutagenesis. The data suggest that the HCoV-229E replicase polyprotein residues, Asn 1302, Asn 1305, His 1310, Gly 1312, and Gly 1313, are part of the enzyme's active site. Characterization of an Appr-1"-pase-deficient HCoV-229E mutant revealed no significant effects on viral RNA synthesis and virus titer, and no reversion to the wild-type sequence was observed when the mutant virus was passaged in cell culture. The apparent dispensability of the conserved X domain activity in vitro indicates that coronavirus replicase polyproteins have evolved to include nonessential functions. The biological significance of the novel enzymatic activity in vivo remains to be investigated.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAsparagineCatalytic DomainCell LineCoronavirus 229E, HumanCoronavirus InfectionsGlycineHistidineMolecular Sequence DataPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesProtein Structure, TertiaryRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRNA, ViralSequence AlignmentViral Nonstructural ProteinsAsparagineGlycineHistidinensp3 protein, alphavirusPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesRNA-Dependent RNA PolymeraseRNA, ViralViral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16188975
PMCPMC1235854
OpenAlexW2027036980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.