Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16188973›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Rapid recruitment of virus-specific CD8 T cells restructures immunodominance during protective secondary responses.

Anne E Tebo, Michael J Fuller, Dalia E Gaddis, Kyoko Kojima, Kunal Rehani, Allan J Zajac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CD8+ memory T cells appear exhausted within hours of acute virus infection.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ICAM-1-dependent tuning of memory CD8 T-cell responses following acute infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne E TeboDepartment of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-2170, USA.
Michael J Fuller
Dalia E Gaddis
Kyoko Kojima
Kunal Rehani
Allan J Zajac
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

IMMUNOLOGIC DISEASES AND BASIC IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007051 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Laurie Ellen Harrington · 1985 to 2026
$13.1M
Regulation of T Cell Activity During Chronic InfectionsR01AI049360 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ZAJAC, ALLAN J · 2001 to 2019
$4.1M
BASIC MECHANISMS IN VIROLOGYT32AI007150 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI PREVELIGE, PETER E. · 1985 to 2007
$1.7M
Regulation of T Cell Activity During Chronic InfectionsR56AI049360 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ZAJAC, ALLAN J · 2014 to 2014
$362k
NIAID NIH HHS AI07051NIAID NIH HHS AI49360NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI049360NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI049360NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007051NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we investigate the attributes of virus-specific memory CD8 T cells which most effectively control secondary infections. By rechallenging mice that had cleared primary lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infections, we revealed that the secondary response is remarkably swift. Within 6 h following secondary infection, the production of gamma interferon becomes detectable directly ex vivo. During this protective phase of the secondary response, a very early elaboration of effector activities is preferentially exhibited by T cells specific for the viral NP396 epitope. This wave of activation contains the infection primarily before the initiation of the proliferative phase of the secondary response. Marked expansion is observed, but its magnitude differs depending on the epitope specificity of the responding cells; between 42 and 48 h following infection, approximately 70% of NP396-specific memory cells are in the S phase of the cell cycle, as assessed by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation studies. Epitope-dependent differences during the proliferative phase of the secondary response were confirmed by adoptive transfer studies with CFSE-labeled T cells. Although NP396-specific T cells typically dominate secondary responses, the broader multiepitope-specific population of antiviral T cells is beneficial for controlling a variant virus with an escape mutation in this epitope. These findings indicate that the induction and maintenance of a focused response contribute to the clearance of secondary infections; however, a more diverse pool of antiviral T cells facilitates long-term immunity to mutable pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFlow CytometryImmunity, CellularImmunologic MemoryInterferon-gammaLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytic ChoriomeningitisLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSpecies SpecificityEpitopes, T-LymphocyteInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID16188973
PMCPMC1235833
OpenAlexW2136904023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.