ArticleCurrent microbiology2005
Genetic diversity on 16S rDNA sequence and phylogenic tree analysis in Pasteurella pneumotropica strains isolated from laboratory animals.
Article in Current microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Is the Current Monitoring of Rodentibacter spp. Exclusively by Molecular Methods Insufficient?Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025Article
- Identification and molecular characterization of a psychrophilic GH1 β-glucosidase from the subtropical soil microorganism Exiguobacterium sp. GXG2.AMB Express · 2019Article
- Sensitive and immunogen-specific serological detection of Rodentibacter pneumotropicus infections in mice.BMC microbiology · 2019Article
- Characterization of Biofilm Formation in [Pasteurella] pneumotropica and [Actinobacillus] muris Isolates of Mouse Origin.PloS one · 2015Article
- Sequestration of CO2 by halotolerant algae.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2014Article
- Assessment of rpoB and 16S rRNA genes as targets for PCR-based identification of Pasteurella pneumotropica.Comparative medicine · 2010Article
- Biochemical characterization and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequences for V-factor dependent members of Pasteurellaceae derived from laboratory rats.Current microbiology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To reveal the genetic diversity of Pasteurella pneumotropica, the 16S rDNA sequence and multiple alignments were performed for 35 strains (from 17 mice, 13 rats, 3 hamsters, 1 rabbit, and 1 guinea pig) identified as P. pneumotropica using a commercial biochemical test kit or PCR test and two reference strains (ATCC 35149 and CNP160). Each strain showed a close similarity with one of the following organisms: P. pneumotropica (M75083), Bisgaard taxon22 (AY172726), Pasteurella sp. MCCM00235 (AF224300), Pasteurellaceae gen. sp. Forsyth A3 (AF224301), and Actinobacillus muris (AF024526) on GenBank, and were divided into six clusters on a phylogenic tree. Two reference strains, P. pneumotropica biotype Jawetz and Heyl, were classified at both ends of the clusters. Our conclusion is that P. pneumotropica should be reclassified because of the very wide genetic diversity that exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16187154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.