Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16187133›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2005

Prescription audit adjunct to rational pharmacotherapy education improves prescribing skills of medical students.

Ahmet Akici, M Zafer Gören, Cenk Aypak, Berna Terzioğlu, Sule Oktay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrated case scripts to enhance diagnostic competency.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2015
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feedback on and knowledge, attitude, and skills at the end of pharmacology practical sessions.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmet AkiciDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
M Zafer Gören
Cenk Aypak
Berna Terzioğlu
Sule Oktay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of a rational pharmacotherapy (RP) teaching program during clinical pharmacology clerkship by analyzing the results of prescription audits (PAs) of the medical students. Collectively, we intended to observe the possible improvement of the students in their prescribing, problem solving and self-directed learning skills.

designAt the beginning and end of the clerkship, the students were presented with cases of uncomplicated osteoarthritis to assess their prescribing skills; format and rationality were scored.

settingA medical school in Turkey that teaches RP to the fourth-year students in clinical pharmacology clerkship.

participantsThere were 94 students of the 2002-2003 academic year in three groups and a single group of students belonging to the previous academic year tested. Of those students from the previous academic year, 26 were also analyzed a year later to demonstrate the long-term impact of the training.

main outcome measuresPrescribing skills of medical students and their opinions about PA.

resultsDirect assessment via PA demonstrated that the scores for post-clerkship prescriptions were far better than those for pre-clerkship prescriptions in terms of format and rationality. Long-term assessment showed that the scores declined within a year following clerkship, but they were still higher than those of their pre-clerkship scripts. Analysis of the questionnaires revealed that the students were satisfied with PA. The majority of the students stated they had learned the general principles of RP and gained better prescribing skills, and they intended to apply most of the principles learned to their future professional lives. The script format scores of a retrospectively created PA-exempted group were significantly lower than those of the students to whom an established PA education was given.

conclusionPA sessions were shown to be an easy and a useful method of both evaluating and reinforcing prescribing skills gained though problem-based RP education.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsEducation, Medical, UndergraduateAnalgesicsClinical ClerkshipDecision MakingHumansOsteoarthritisPharmacology, ClinicalProblem-Based LearningProgram EvaluationSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyAnalgesics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.