ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2005
Treatment of steroid sensitive nephrotic syndrome.
Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased behavioural problems associated with corticosteroid use in children with nephrotic syndrome: a Southeast Asian perspective.Singapore medical journal · 2023Article
- Treatment Outcomes of Pediatric Nephrotic Syndrome Patients Treated in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized and Mekelle General Hospitals, Ethiopia.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2021Article
- Increased urinary exosomal microRNAs in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.EBioMedicine · 2019Article
- Review
- Loss of Epithelial Membrane Protein 2 Aggravates Podocyte Injury via Upregulation of Caveolin-1.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2016Article
- Spectrum of childhood nephrotic syndrome in Iran: A single center study.Indian journal of nephrology · 2010Article
- Growth in Children with Steroid Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a chronic glomerular disorder, and if untreated, is associated with increased risk of life-threatening infections, thromboembolism, lipid abnormalities, and malnutrition. The aim of the management of NS in children is to induce and maintain complete remission with resolution of proteinuria and edema without encountering serious adverse effects of therapy. Over 90% of cases in children are due to minimal change disease (MCD) and a majority of them will respond to corticosteroid therapy. Steroid sensitive NS is considered to be a relatively benign condition; progression to end stage renal failure is extremely rare and over 80% achieve spontaneous remission in later childhood. The early disease is characterized by a relapsing course, placing the child at risk of acute complications. The occurrence of frequent relapses necessitates clear therapeutic strategies in order to maintain sustained remission and minimize steroid toxicity. Numerous therapeutic regimens have been proposed utilizing steroid sparing agents such as alkylating agents, principally, cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil, calcineurin inhibitors namely cyclosporin A and immunomodulatory drug levamisole with variable success and associated side-effects. It is therefore important that the benefits and risks of these agents are weighed before considering their use in the treatment of patients with NS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.