Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1618634›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry1992

Immunocytochemical localization of cathepsin D in the rat osteoclast.

T Goto, T Tsukuba, N Ayasaka, K Yamamoto, T Tanaka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T GotoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Kyushu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Fukuoka, Japan.
T Tsukuba
N Ayasaka
K Yamamoto
T Tanaka
Kyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed immunocytochemical localization of cathepsin D in osteoclasts of the proximal growth plate of the rat femurs using both the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method for cryo-semi-thin (1 micron) sections and the colloidal gold-labeled IgG method for K4M ultra-thin sections. At the light microscopic level, cathepsin D immunoreactivity in the osteoclasts appeared at the vesicles, granules, and/or small vacuoles. They were distributed throughout the cytoplasm of each cell and were relatively numerous close to the bone surface. This antigen could not be detected at the eroded bone surface. As for other cells, immunoreactivity was seen only in the lysosomes of osteoblast-like cells. Immunoreactivity in the osteoclasts was stronger and greater in the density and number than in osteoblast-like cells. At the electron microscopic level, osteoclasts with well-developed ruffled border possessed numerous cathepsin D-containing lysosomes, vacuoles, and coated vesicle-like structures. Cathepsin D-containing lysosomes fused with cathepsin-negative vacuoles and formed large secondary lysosomes. Osteoclasts with poorly developed ruffled border possessed fewer cathepsin D-containing lysosomes than those with well-developed ruffled border. No immunogold particles were seen in vacuole-like channel expansions of the ruffled borders, between the channels of the ruffled borders, or on the eroded bone surface. These findings demonstrate that osteoclasts contain a large amount of cathepsin D. They suggest that cathepsin D is necessary for osteoclastic bone resorption, that it plays an indirect rather than direct role.

Indexed as

AnimalsCathepsin DFemurImmunohistochemistryLysosomesMicroscopy, ImmunoelectronMitochondriaOsteoclastsRatsRats, Inbred StrainsVacuolesCathepsin D

Identifiers

PMID1618634
OpenAlexW2019815538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.