Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16185247›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2005

The survival of neural precursor cell grafts is influenced by in vitro expansion.

Rike Zietlow, Vladimir Pekarik, Richard J E Armstrong, Pamela Tyers, Stephen B Dunnett, Anne E Rosser

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Temporal and epigenetic regulation of neurodevelopmental plasticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2008
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rike ZietlowSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, UK. zietlowr@cf.ac.uk
Vladimir Pekarik
Richard J E Armstrong
Pamela Tyers
Stephen B Dunnett
Anne E Rosser
Cardiff University · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Parkinson's UK G-4036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic neural precursor cells (ENPs) provide a potential alternative for transplantation in neurodegenerative diseases, as they can be expanded in culture, avoiding many of the practical obstacles that limit the application of transplanting primary neurones. However, grafts of ENPs into animal models show variable survival and limited differentiation into neurones. The effect of expansion time on their ability to survive and differentiate may be an important factor in this and has not been examined directly. In these experiments, murine and human ENPs were expanded for short (4 weeks) and long (20 weeks) periods before transplantation into the adult rat striatum. Whereas grafts of both short- and long-term expanded human ENPs survived for 4 weeks following transplantation, by 20 weeks all long-term expanded grafts had disappeared. Murine ENPs behaved similarly: only grafts of short-term expanded ENPs survived at 12 weeks following transplantation. RT-PCR analysis of ENP cultures after 4 and 20 weeks of expansion demonstrated changes in expression of a number of different groups of genes. We conclude that long-term expansion of ENPs profoundly impairs their ability to survive long-term after transplantation into the adult brain. This has implications for the potential use of these cells for neural transplantation strategies.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationHumansMiceNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuronsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16185247
PMCPMC1571534
OpenAlexW2076028515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.