Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16184192›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2005

ReAS: Recovery of ancestral sequences for transposable elements from the unassembled reads of a whole genome shotgun.

Ruiqiang Li, Jia Ye, Songgang Li, Jing Wang, Yujun Han, Chen Ye, Jian Wang, Huanming Yang, Jun Yu, Gane Ka-Shu Wong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Study of Dispersed Repeats in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Finding and Characterizing Repeats in Plant Genomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Estimating theCurrent genomics · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Mobile DNA · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Ruiqiang LiJames D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jia Ye
Songgang Li
Jing Wang
Yujun Han
Chen Ye
Jian Wang
Huanming Yang
Jun Yu
Gane Ka-Shu Wong
Jun Wang
BGI Group (China) · CN

Funding

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR NATURAL GENETIC VARIATIONP50HG002351 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI OLSON, MAYNARD V. · 2001 to 2005
$15.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1 P50 HG02351NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an algorithm, ReAS, to recover ancestral sequences for transposable elements (TEs) from the unassembled reads of a whole genome shotgun. The main assumptions are that these TEs must exist at high copy numbers across the genome and must not be so old that they are no longer recognizable in comparison to their ancestral sequences. Tested on the japonica rice genome, ReAS was able to reconstruct all of the high copy sequences in the Repbase repository of known TEs, and increase the effectiveness of RepeatMasker in identifying TEs from genome sequences.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAlgorithmsDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNA Transposable ElementsGene DuplicationGenome, PlantOryzaDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID16184192
PMCPMC1232128
OpenAlexW2070328439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.