Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16183980›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2005

Effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among youths.

M Siegel, A B Albers, D M Cheng, L Biener, N A Rigotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Highlights from a workshop on opportunities for cancer prevention during preadolescence and adolescence.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Daily patterns of conjoint smoking and drinking in college student smokers.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2010
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A longitudinal study of policy effect (smoke-free legislation) on smoking norms: ITC Scotland/United Kingdom.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2009
    Article
  17. Tobacco control policy and adolescent cigarette smoking status in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M SiegelSocial and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA. mbsiegel@bu.edu.
A B Albers
D M Cheng
L Biener
N A Rigotti

Funding

Smoking Trajectories amid Waning State Program BudgetsR01CA086257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI BIENER, LOIS BARBARA · 2000 to 2008
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS 5 R01 CA86257-04NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile smoke-free restaurant laws are intended to protect the public from secondhand smoke exposure, they may also discourage smoking among adolescents. There is no evidence from longitudinal studies to test this hypothesis.

objectiveTo examine the effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: A cohort of 2623 Massachusetts youths, ages 12-17 years at baseline, was interviewed via random digit dial telephone survey in 2001-2002 and followed up two years later. A generalised estimating equations (GEE) logistic regression analysis was used and controlled for potential individual, household, and town level confounding factors.

main outcome measureProgression to established smoking during the two year follow up period (defined as having smoked 100 or more cigarettes in one's life).

resultsCompared to youths living in towns with weak regulations, those living in towns with strong regulations (complete restaurant smoking bans) had less than half the odds of progression to established smoking (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.66). The association was stronger for youths in towns with strong regulations in effect for two or more years (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.37), although it was still present for those in towns with strong regulations in effect for less than two years (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90). No relationship was found between living in a town with a medium restaurant smoking regulation (restriction of smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas) and rates of progression to established smoking.

conclusionsLocal restaurant smoking bans may be an effective intervention to prevent youth smoking.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSmoking PreventionAdolescentAir Pollution, IndoorChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMassachusettsOdds RatioRestaurantsSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID16183980
PMCPMC1748108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.