ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2005
Myocardial energy metabolism in ischemic preconditioning and cardioplegia: a metabolic control analysis.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperpolarized [1,4-JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018Article
- Tolerance to ischaemic injury in remodelled mouse hearts: less ischaemic glycogenolysis and preserved metabolic efficiency.Cardiovascular research · 2015Article
- Mitochondrial dysfunctions in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome explained by activated immuno-inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways.Metabolic brain disease · 2014Article
- Article
- Modulation of the protein kinase Cdelta interaction with the "d" subunit of F1F0-ATP synthase in neonatal cardiac myocytes: development of cell-permeable, mitochondrially targeted inhibitor and facilitator peptides.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For both, cardioplegia (CP) and ischemic preconditioning (IP), increased ischemic tolerance with reduction in infarct size is well documented. These cardioprotective effects are related to a limitation of high energy phosphate (HEP) depletion. As CP and IP have to be assumed to act by different mechanisms, their effects on myocardial HEP metabolism cannot be assumed to be identical. Therefore, a systematic analysis of myocardial HEP metabolism for both procedures and their combination was performed, addressing the question whether there are different effects on myocardial HEP metabolism by IP and CP. In this study, metabolic control analysis was used to analyze the regulation of HEP metabolism. In open chest pigs subjected to 45 min LAD occlusion (index ischemia), CP and IP preserved myocardial ATP (control (C) 0.14 +/- 0.05 micromol/g wwt; CP: 0.95 +/- 0.14, IP: 0.61 +/- 0.12; p<0.05 C vs. CP and IP) and reduced myocardial necrosis (infarct size IA/RA: C: 90.0 +/- 3.0%; CP: 0.0 +/- 0.0% but patchy necroses; IP: 5.05 +/- 2.1%; p<0.05 C vs. CP and IP). The effects on HEP metabolism, however, were different: CP acted predominantly by slowing down the breakdown of phosphocreatine (PCr) during early phases of ischemia (C: DeltaPCr 0-2 min: 5.24 +/- 0.32 micromol/g wwt; CP: DeltaPCr 0-2 min: 3.38 +/- 0.23 micromol/g wwt, p<0.05 vs. C), leaving ATP breakdown during later stages unaffected (C: DeltaATP 5-45 min: 1.77 +/- 0.11 micromol/g wwt CP: DeltaATP 5-45 min: 1.59 +/- 0.28 micromol/g wwt, n.s. vs. C). In contrast to CP, in IP PCr breakdown was even increased (IP: DeltaPCr 0-2 min: 7.06 +/- 0.34 micromol/g wwt, p<0.05 vs. C), but ATP depletion greatly attenuated (IP: DeltaATP 5-45 min: 0.48 +/- 0.10 micromol/g wwt, p<0.05 vs. C and CP). Combining IP and CP yielded an additive effect with slowing down the breakdown of both PCr (IP+CP: DeltaPCr 0-2 min: 5.09+/- 0.35 micromol/g wwt, p<0.05 vs. C and IP) and ATP (IP+CP: DeltaATP 5-45 min: 0.56 +/- 0.48 micromol/g wwt, p<0.05 vs. C and CP), resulting in a higher ATP content at the end of index ischemia (1.86 +/- 0.46 micromol/g wwt, p<0.05 vs. C, CP and IP). Compared to IP, combining IP+CP achieved also a further reduction in infarct size (IA/RA: 0.0 +/- 0.0%, p<0.05 vs IP) and--compared to CP--a disappearance of the patchy necroses. The concept of major differences in myocardial HEP metabolism during CP and IP is further supported at a molecular level by metabolic control analysis. CP but not IP slowed down the CK reaction velocity at high PCr levels. In contrast to CP exerting a continuous decline in vATPase for any given ATP level, in IP myocardium ATPase reaction velocity was even increased at higher ATP contents, whereas a marked decrease in ATPase reaction velocity was found if ATP levels decreased. The equilibrium of the CK-reaction remained unchanged following CP, whereas IP induced a changing CK equilibrium, which was the more shifted towards PCr the more myocardial HEP content decreased. The data demonstrate different effects of CP and IP on myocardial HEP metabolism, i.e. PCr and ATP breakdown as well as the apparent equilibrium of the creatine kinase (CK)-reaction. For these reasons the combination of the two protective interventions has an additive effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.