Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16177318›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2005

Minimum infective dose of Mycobacterium bovis in cattle.

Gillian S Dean, Shelley G Rhodes, Michael Coad, Adam O Whelan, Paul J Cockle, Derek J Clifford, R Glyn Hewinson, H Martin Vordermeier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Challenge Dose Titration in aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Evaluation of Pressurized Steam Disinfection of Surfaces Contaminated byApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Genomic epidemiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  7. The rate and role of pseudogenes of theMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evaluation of the Presence and Viability ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gillian S DeanTB Research Group, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Weybridge, UK. g.dean@vla.defra.gsi.gov.uk
Shelley G Rhodes
Michael Coad
Adam O Whelan
Paul J Cockle
Derek J Clifford
R Glyn Hewinson
H Martin Vordermeier

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the minimum infective dose of Mycobacterium bovis necessary to stimulate specific immune responses and generate pathology in cattle. Four groups of calves (20 animals) were infected by the intratracheal route with 1,000, 100, 10, or 1 CFU of M. bovis. Specific immune responses (gamma interferon [IFN-gamma] and interleukin-4 [IL-4] responses) to mycobacterial antigens were monitored throughout the study, and the responses to the tuberculin skin test were assessed at two times. Rigorous post mortem examinations were performed to determine the presence of pathology, and samples were taken for microbiological and histopathological confirmation of M. bovis infection. One-half of the animals infected with 1 CFU of M. bovis developed pulmonary pathology typical of bovine tuberculosis. No differences in the severity of pathology were observed for the different M. bovis doses. All animals that developed pathology were skin test positive and produced specific IFN-gamma and IL-4 responses. No differences in the sizes of the skin test reactions, the times taken to achieve a positive IFN-gamma result, or the levels of the IFN-gamma and IL-4 responses were observed for the different M. bovis doses, suggesting that diagnostic assays (tuberculin skin test and IFN-gamma test) can detect cattle soon after M. bovis infection regardless of the dose. This information should be useful in modeling the dynamics of bovine tuberculosis in cattle and in assessing the risk of transmission.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4LungMycobacterium bovisTuberculin TestTuberculosis, BovineInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4

Identifiers

PMID16177318
PMCPMC1230957
OpenAlexW2098125708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.