Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16177278›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2006

Randomized trial of supported employment integrated with assertive community treatment for rural adults with severe mental illness.

Paul B Gold, Neil Meisler, Alberto B Santos, Mark A Carnemolla, Olivia H Williams, Jennie Keleher

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Intensive case management for severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  8. Intensive case management for severe mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul B GoldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 67 President Street, IOP 4 South, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. goldpb@musc.edu
Neil Meisler
Alberto B Santos
Mark A Carnemolla
Olivia H Williams
Jennie Keleher

Funding

COMMUNITY INTEGRATION OF PERSONS WITH MENTAL ILLNESSK23MH001903 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI GOLD, PAUL B. · 2000 to 2004
$688k
RURAL BASED SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT APPROACHESUD7SM051823 · SM · SOUTH CAROLINA STATE DEPT OF MENTAL HLTH · PI WILLIAMS, OLIVIA H · 1995 to 1995
–
CMHS SAMHSA HHS SM51823CMHS SAMHSA HHS SM53542NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH001903NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH001903-05NIMH NIH HHS MH01903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban-based randomized clinical trials of integrated supported employment (SE) and mental health services in the United States on average have doubled the employment rates of adults with severe mental illness (SMI) compared to traditional vocational rehabilitation. However, studies have not yet explored if the service integrative functions of SE will be effective in coordinating rural-based services that are limited, loosely linked, and geographically dispersed. In addition, SE's ability to replicate the work outcomes of urban programs in rural economies with scarce and less diverse job opportunities remains unknown. In a rural South Carolina county, we designed and implemented a program blending Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) with an SE model, Individual Placement and Support (IPS). The ACT-IPS program operated with ACT and IPS subteams that tightly integrated vocational with mental health services within each self-contained team. In a 24-month randomized clinical trial, we compared ACT-IPS to a traditional program providing parallel vocational and mental health services on competitive work outcomes for adults with SMI (N = 143; 69% schizophrenia, 77% African American). More ACT-IPS participants held competitive jobs (64 versus 26%; p < .001, effect size [ES] = 0.38) and earned more income (median [Mdn] = 549 US dollars, interquartile range [IQR] = 0-5,145 US dollars, versus Mdn = 0 US dollars, IQR = 0-40 US dollars; p < .001, ES = 0.70) than comparison participants. The competitive work outcomes of this rural ACT-IPS program closely resemble those of urban SE programs. However, achieving economic self-sufficiently and developing careers probably require increasing access to higher education and jobs imparting marketable technical skills.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdolescentAdultCommunity Mental Health ServicesEmployment, SupportedFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRural Health ServicesSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID16177278
PMCPMC1435374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.