Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16176733›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

A practical method for monitoring general practice mortality in the UK: findings from a pilot study in a health board of Northern Ireland.

Mohammed A Mohammed, Kathryn Booth, David Marshall, Máire Brolly, Tom Marshall, Kar-Keung Cheng, Martin Hayes, Sandy Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developing performance indicators for primary care: Walsall's experience.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  2. Routine mortality monitoring for detecting mass murder in UK general practice: test of effectiveness using modelling.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Can mortality monitoring in general practice be made to work?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed A MohammedDepartment of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham.
Kathryn Booth
David Marshall
Máire Brolly
Tom Marshall
Kar-Keung Cheng
Martin Hayes
Sandy Fitzpatrick

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Baker report into Dr Harold Shipman's murders recommended monitoring mortality in general practice, but there is currently no practical method available to implement this.

aimTo monitor mortality rates in response to the Baker report and to use the data to improve quality of care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Prospective mortality monitoring study.

settingEastern Health and Social Services Board, Northern Ireland.

methodLinked quarterly mortality data from 1994-2001 were compiled for 114 general practices in Eastern Health and Social Services Board in Northern Ireland. Cross-sectional control charts compared crude and adjusted mortality rates across all the practices. Longitudinal control charts analysed quarterly mortality rates over 28 quarters within each practice. Practices were sent their own control charts and invited to feedback workshops. Special cause variation in mortality was investigated as follows: checks on data, case-mix, practice structures, processes of care and finally individual carers.

resultsAge, sex and deprivation adjusted cross-sectional control charts identified 18 practices as showing special cause variation in their mortality (11 high and 7 low). Assignable causes were found for all high special cause practices: large numbers of nursing home patients (six practices), very high levels of deprivation and high morbidity not captured by our case-mix adjustment (five practices). For three of seven low special cause practices, case-mix adjustment underestimated affluence and overestimated morbidity levels. Feedback indicated widespread support for the principle of monitoring, but concerns about the public disclosure of mortality data.

conclusionsWe have successfully developed and piloted a general practice mortality monitoring system with the support and participation of local stakeholders. This used control charts for analysis and followed a scientific strategy for investigating special cause variation.

Indexed as

MortalityEpidemiologic MethodsFamily PracticeHumansNorthern IrelandProfessional PracticeRisk Adjustment

Identifiers

PMID16176733
PMCPMC1464080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.