Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16175416›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2006

Acute physiological responses in healthy men during whole-body vibration.

Rammohan V Maikala, Sharla King, Yagesh N Bhambhani

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02341976 (Study of Pelvic Floor Muscle and Urinary Sphincter Activity by Electromyography During Whole Body Vibration Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02341976 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Study of Pelvic Floor Muscle and Urinary Sphincter Activity by Electromyography During Whole Body Vibration Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2015 to 2015Enrolled0ConditionsHealthyArmsVibratory platform exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Whole-body vibration and occupational physical performance: a review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rammohan V MaikalaLiberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA. rammohan.maikala@libertymutual.com
Sharla King
Yagesh N Bhambhani
University of Alberta · CALiberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe influence of backrest support and handgrip contractions on acute metabolic, respiratory, and cardiovascular responses were evaluated in 13 healthy men during exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV).

methodsFollowing assessment of aerobic fitness during arm cranking, subjects were exposed to frequencies 3, 4.5, and 6 Hz with 0.9 g(r.m.s) acceleration magnitude on a vibrating base in randomized order, on separate days. Each exposure included 6 min baseline without WBV, 8 min of WBV exposure either 'with' or 'without' backrest, 4 min recovery, followed by 8 min of WBV with opposite backrest condition, and 4 min recovery. During the final minute of WBV, subjects performed right hand maximal rhythmic handgrip contractions for one minute. During baseline and before completion of WBV session 'with' and 'without' backrest, cardiac output was estimated indirectly by carbon dioxide rebreathing.

resultsAt 3 and 4.5, and 3 and 6 Hz, absolute and relative oxygen uptake demonstrated significantly greater responses during sitting 'without' backrest than 'with' backrest (P<0.01). At 3 and 4.5 Hz, heart rate and oxygen pulse responses were significantly greater during WBV combined with handgrip contractions than during WBV alone (P<0.01), demonstrating physical work during WBV will enhance greater metabolic responses. Stroke volume was the lowest at 4.5 Hz (P<0.01). Influence of aerobic fitness was evident only in absolute oxygen uptake, oxygen pulse, and ventilation volume (P<0.01).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that subjects exposed to physical work during WBV will experience greater metabolic responses compared to WBV alone, and the physiological responses during WBV resemble to that of a light physical work. Despite low metabolic rates during WBV, the effect of aerobic fitness suggests the importance of physical activity in occupations exposed to WBV.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemHuman BodyRespiratory SystemVibrationAdultAlbertaCardiac OutputHand StrengthHumansMaleOccupational ExposurePhysical FitnessSpine

Identifiers

PMID16175416
OpenAlexW2049771172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.