Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16171715›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Automatic quantification of right ventricular volumes and right ventricular ejection fraction with gated blood pool SPECT: Comparison of 8- and 16-frame gated blood pool SPECT with first-pass radionuclide angiography.

Seong-Jang Kim, In-Ju Kim, Yun-Seong Kim, Yong-Ki Kim, Yong Beom Shin, Dong-Soo Kim

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of biventricular ejection fractions using cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT and planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  2. Gated blood pool SPECT: The estimation of right ventricular volume and function is algorithm dependent in a clinical setting.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
  3. Assessment of RV function using gated blood pool SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
  4. Is TOMPOOL (gated blood-pool SPECT processing software) accurate to diagnose right and left ventricular dysfunction in a clinical setting?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
  6. SPECT radionuclide angiography: it is time for a consensus statement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seong-Jang KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, 1-10 Ami-dong, Seo-gu, Busan, Republic of Korea.
In-Ju Kim
Yun-Seong Kim
Yong-Ki Kim
Yong Beom Shin
Dong-Soo Kim
Pusan National University Hospital · KRPusan National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare 8- and 16-frame gated blood pool single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (GBPS) for the determination of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and right ventricular (RV) volumes in subjects who underwent two consecutive GBPS studies. METHODS AND

resultsIn this study 65 consecutive patients (29 men and 36 women) referred for first-pass radionuclide angiography (FP-RNA) underwent FP-RNA and both 8- and 16-frame GBPS. The mean FP-RNA RVEF was statistically lower than RVEF determined by 8-frame GBPS (P < .001) and 16-frame GBPS (P < .001). Comparison of RVEF by FP-RNA and GBPS yielded coefficients of 0.8666 (P < .0001) for 16-frame GBPS and 0.7290 (P < .0001) for 8-frame GBPS. The correlation of RVEF between 8- and 16-frame GBPS showed a coefficient of 0.6657 (P < .0001). The mean RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) calculated with 8- and 16-frame GBPS showed no statistical differences (P = .3580). The mean RV end-systolic volume (ESV) calculated with 8- and 16-frame GBPS also showed no statistical differences (P = .2265). Comparison of EDV by 8- and 16-frame GBPS yielded a coefficient of 0.7327 (P < .0001). The correlation between ESV by 8-frame GBPS and 16-frame GBPS showed a coefficient of 0.6067 (P < .0001).

conclusionGBPS is a simple and reproducible acquisition method for the assessment of RVEF and RV volumes. RVEF values calculated by 8- and 16-frame GBPS correlated well with FP-RNA, although mean RVEF values from FP-RNA were lower than GBPS RVEF values. In addition, RV ESV and EDV were both well correlated with 8- and 16-frame GBPS. GBPS should prove to be useful in diagnosis, as well as in following disease progression and evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, in patients with biventricular dysfunction.

Indexed as

Cardiac VolumeStroke VolumeFemaleGated Blood-Pool ImagingHumansImage EnhancementMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVentricular Dysfunction, RightVentriculography, First-Pass

Identifiers

PMID16171715
OpenAlexW2040011123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.