ArticlePhotosynthesis research2005
Dynamics of fluxes through photosynthetic complexes in response to changing light and inorganic carbon acclimation in Synechococcus elongatus.
Article in Photosynthesis research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyanobacterial Bioenergetics in Relation to Cellular Growth and Productivity.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023Article
- Combined effects of CO2 and light on the N2-fixing cyanobacterium Trichodesmium IMS101: a mechanistic view.Plant physiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyanobacteria acclimate to environmental inorganic carbon (C(i)) concentrations through re-organisations of photosynthetic function and the induction of carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCMs), which alter and constrain their subsequent acclimation to changing light. We grew cells acclimated to high C(i) (4 mM) or low C(i) (0.02 mM), shifted them from 50 micromol m(-2) s(-1) to 500 micromol m(-2) s(-1), and quantified their photosynthetic performance in parallel with quantitation of allocations to key indicator macromolecules. Pigments cell(-1) declined, PsbA (PS II), AtpB (ATP Synthase), RbcL (Rubisco) and GlnA (Glutamine Synthetase) increased, and PsaC (PS I) remained stable through the light shift. The increase in these protein pools was slower and smaller in low C(i) cells, but acted in both cell types to re-normalise the electron fluxes through the catalytic complexes back toward values before the light shift (for PsbA and GlnA) or even below the initial flux per complex (for RbcL). In contrast, an increased electron flux per PsaC was sustained for at least 6 h after the increase in light. Initially, high levels of PS II cell(-1) and PS II connectivity in high C(i) cells caused a more rapid net photoinactivation of PS II in high C(i) cells than in low C(i) cells, depressing the rate of PS II-specific electron transport (PS II ETR) to levels similar to linear ETR (net O(2) evolution minus respiration). In low C(i) cells, PS II ETR remained in excess of linear ETR and may have helped maintain CCM activity. The pool sizes of PsbA, AtpB and GlnA correlated with cellular growth rate, and changed at similar rates in high C(i) and low C(i) cells when expressed on a generational rather than chronological timescale, which has implications for differing ecology of high and low C(i) cells under variable natural light.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.