Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16170242›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2005

Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians.

Louise S Acheson, Kurt C Stange, Stephen Zyzanski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Primary-care providers' perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Disparities in BRCA counseling across providers in a diverse population of young breast cancer survivors.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The practice of adult genetics: a 7-year experience from a single center.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2013
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home.Journal of general internal medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louise S AchesonFamily Medicine Research Division and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, OH 44106-5036, USA.
Kurt C Stange
Stephen Zyzanski
Case Western Reserve University · USCase Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

THE 'GREAT'SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY FAMILIAL CANCER RISKK07CA086958 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ACHESON, LOUISE SEYMOUR · 2000 to 2005
$656k
CANCER PREVENTION &CONTROL INNOVATIONS IN PRIMARY CAREK24CA081031 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI STANGE, KURT C · 2000 to 2004
$601k
BHP HRSA HHS PE-15024NCI NIH HHS K07 CA86958NCI NIH HHS K24 CA-81031PHS HHS K12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the genetics-related clinical issues encountered by family physicians, and the medical problems they referred to genetics consultants.

methodsQuestionnaires were mailed to a nationwide, random sample of 498 practicing family physicians, asking how many times in the past year they discussed genetic information about 19 familial or genetic conditions with patients and what proportion of the families with each genetic condition were referred for genetics consultation. Factor analysis was used to group the conditions.

resultsThe response rate was 38% (n = 190). Respondents were similar to non-respondents except that more were women. Most family physicians reported discussing the genetics of common cancers, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer's disease with two or more patients in the past year. Thirteen percent had referred families for genetics assessment of breast-ovarian cancer but only two made genetics referrals for cardiovascular disease or dementia. 25% to 50% of family physicians had addressed genetic issues in at least one family with hemoglobinopathy, a blood clotting disorder, hemochromatosis, mental illness, vision loss or deafness, chromosome abnormality, infertility or pregnancy loss, congenital anomalies, mental retardation, and neurofibromatosis. Most cases were not referred to geneticists. Of respondents, 23% said that genetics consultation is very difficult to obtain or unavailable and 18% listed ethical and social dilemmas related to pursuing genetic diagnosis.

conclusionNationwide, family physicians address a variety of genetics issues with patients, most frequently consulting geneticists for perinatal conditions and familial cancers. Access to genetics consultation is more difficult in rural areas. These data may be used in organizing genetics services and in planning professional education programs for primary care clinicians.

Indexed as

Genetics, MedicalPhysicians, FamilyPatient Education as TopicSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16170242
OpenAlexW2068873438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.