Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16170240›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2005

Cost-effectiveness of a school-based Tay-Sachs and cystic fibrosis genetic carrier screening program.

Emma Warren, Rob Anderson, Anné L Proos, Leslie B Burnett, Kris Barlow-Stewart, Jane Hall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Interventions That Affect Fertility and Childbearing: How Health Effects Are Measured Matters.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2015
    Review
  5. Tay-Sachs disease: current perspectives from Australia.The application of clinical genetics · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma WarrenCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rob Anderson
Anné L Proos
Leslie B Burnett
Kris Barlow-Stewart
Jane Hall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore the cost-effectiveness of school-based multi-disease genetic carrier screening.

methodDecision analysis of the cost-effectiveness of a school-based Tay-Sachs disease and cystic fibrosis genetic carrier screening program, relative to no screening. Data relating to ethnicity profile, test-accepting behavior, and screening program cost were sourced from an existing program in Sydney, Australia.

resultsCompared to no screening, the incremental cost-effectiveness of the screening program is A dollar 5,834 per additional carrier detected. This cost-effectiveness ratio is most sensitive to changes in genetic test accuracy, and the cost of laboratory assays. The results imply a cost per affected birth avoided of approximately A dollar 530,000 (approximately US dollar 371,000).

conclusionsThis preconceptional genetic carrier screening program offers comparable cost-effectiveness to prenatal screening programs for cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

SchoolsAdolescentAlgorithmsCost-Benefit AnalysisCystic FibrosisGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingHumansJewsModels, TheoreticalTay-Sachs Disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.