ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2005
Bile salt diarrhea.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diet management in congenital diarrheas and enteropathies - general concepts and disease-specific approach, a narrative review.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Review
- The Yin and Yang of bile acid action on tight junctions in a model colonic epithelium.Physiological reports · 2017Article
- Chenodeoxycholic acid stimulates Cl(-) secretion via cAMP signaling and increases cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator phosphorylation in T84 cells.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2013Article
- Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli inhibits ileal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter ASBT.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2012Article
- Modulation of ileal apical Na+-dependent bile acid transporter ASBT by protein kinase C.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alterations in bile acid metabolism and in the enterohepatic circulation are often associated with chronic diarrhea and should be considered when more common causes of chronic diarrhea have been excluded. Bile acid diarrhea most often occurs in disease or resection of the terminal ileum, in which there is increased exposure of the colonic mucosa to bile salts with consequent activation of fluid and electrolyte secretion. Congenital or acquired defects in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids also may lead to diarrhea. Although multiple diagnostic tests may be considered to confirm abnormal fecal bile acid losses, the most critical elements of the clinical evaluation of suspected bile acid diarrhea are a careful history to exclude more common causes of chronic diarrhea and a diagnostic trial of bile acid-binding resins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.