Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16168109›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2005

Anticancer properties of propofol-docosahexaenoate and propofol-eicosapentaenoate on breast cancer cells.

Rafat A Siddiqui, Mustapha Zerouga, Min Wu, Alicia Castillo, Kevin Harvey, Gary P Zaloga, William Stillwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Promising Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Use of a colorimetric assay to evaluate the proliferation of canine mammary tumor cells exposed to propofol.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2019
    Article
  13. Aberrant fatty acid profile and FFAR4 signaling confer endocrine resistance in breast cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rafat A SiddiquiMethodist Research Institute, Clarian Health Partners, Indianapolis, IN, USA. rsiddiqu@clarian.org
Mustapha Zerouga
Min Wu
Alicia Castillo
Kevin Harvey
Gary P Zaloga
William Stillwell
Indiana University Health · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpidemiological evidence strongly links fish oil, which is rich in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), with low incidences of several types of cancer. The inhibitory effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on cancer development and progression are supported by studies with cultured cells and animal models. Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is the most extensively used general anesthetic-sedative agent employed today and is nontoxic to humans at high levels (50 microg/ml). Clinically relevant concentrations of propofol (3 to 8 microg/ml; 20 to 50 microM) have also been reported to have anticancer activities. The present study describes the synthesis, purification, characterization and evaluation of two novel anticancer conjugates, propofol-docosahexaenoate (propofol-DHA) and propofol-eicosapentaenoate (propofol-EPA).

methodsThe conjugates linking an omega-3 fatty acid, either DHA or EPA, with propofol were synthesized and tested for their effects on migration, adhesion and apoptosis on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.

resultsAt low concentrations (25 microM), DHA, EPA or propofol alone or in combination had minimal effect on cell adhesion to vitronectin, cell migration against serum and the induction of apoptosis (only 5 to 15% of the cells became apoptotic). In contrast, the propofol-DHA or propofol-EPA conjugates significantly inhibited cell adhesion (15 to 30%) and migration (about 50%) and induced apoptosis (about 40%) in breast cancer cells.

conclusionThese results suggest that the novel propofol-DHA and propofol-EPA conjugates reported here may be useful for the treatment of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCaspasesCell AdhesionCell DivisionCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell SurvivalDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidEnzyme ActivationFemaleFree Radical ScavengersHeLa CellsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsCaspasesDocosahexaenoic AcidsEicosapentaenoic AcidFree Radical ScavengersPropofol

Identifiers

PMID16168109
PMCPMC1242121
OpenAlexW1527114747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.