Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16167153›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2005

A 2-year clinical evaluation of sealed noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions in adolescents.

Santiago S Gomez, Cristian P Basili, Claes-Göran Emilson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02338180 (A Randomized Clinical Trial on Preventive and Therapeutic Proximal Sealants), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02338180 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Clinical Trial on Preventive and Therapeutic Proximal Sealants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de ValparaisoRan2009 to 2012Enrolled390ConditionsDental CariesArmsproximal preventive sealants, proximal therapeutic sealant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2010
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Santiago S GomezDepartment of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Valparaiso University, Casilla 178-V, Valparaiso, Chile. santiago.gomez@uv.cl
Cristian P Basili
Claes-Göran Emilson
University of Valparaíso · CLUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the clinical performance of a therapeutic sealant to arrest the progression of noncavitated approximal posterior carious lesions. The study population comprised 50 adolescents in whom bitewing radiographs had been taken for diagnosis of caries. Approximal noncavitated lesions in premolars and molars (4d-7m) were selected. One group (n=17) had a sealant placed after tooth separation on all enamel lesions. A second group (n=7) received sealant and fluoride varnish in a split-mouth design. A control group (n=26) received a standard fluoride varnish treatment without tooth separation. Follow-up radiographs were taken after 2 years and were analyzed together with the baseline radiographs in a blind study setting. About 93% of the sealed initial carious lesions showed no progression. The corresponding value for the fluoride varnish control group was 88%. In the split-mouth study, 92 and 88% of the surfaces with enamel caries showed no progression after sealant or fluoride varnish treatment, respectively. The difference between the two treatment procedures was not statistically significant. The incidence rate for the transition from enamel caries to dentin caries or fillings was 3.5-3.9 surfaces/100 years in the sealant groups and 5.9-6.1 surfaces/100 years in the fluoride varnish groups. The results show the potential of sealants to act as a noninvasive treatment of early approximal enamel lesions.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalAdolescentAdultBicuspidBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateCariostatic AgentsChildDental CariesDental EnamelDental Restoration, PermanentDentinDisease ProgressionFemaleFluorides, TopicalFollow-Up StudiesHumansBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateCariostatic AgentsFluorides, TopicalPit and Fissure Sealants

Identifiers

PMID16167153
OpenAlexW2010757318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.