Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16164823›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology

Macrophage-targeted photodynamic therapy: scavenger receptor expression and activation state.

Q Liu, M R Hamblin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Photodynamic Therapy for Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The impact of macrophage-cancer cell interaction on the efficacy of photodynamic therapy.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Multimodality PET/MRI agents targeted to activated macrophages.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intravascular detection of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques using a fluorescent photosensitizer targeted to the scavenger receptor.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Q LiuWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
M R Hamblin
Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Macrophage Targeted Photodynamic TherapyR01CA083882 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HAMBLIN, MICHAEL R · 2002 to 2004
$740k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA083882NCI NIH HHS R01-CA/AI838801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophage-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) may have applications in the selective killing of cells involved in atherosclerosis, inflammation and tumor. We have previously shown that a conjugate between the photosensitizer chlorin(e6) (ce6) and maleylated bovine serum albumin (BSA-mal) gives highly selective targeting to macrophages. In this report we examine the effect of macrophage activation and scavenger receptor class A (SRA) expression on this targeting in two murine macrophage tumor cell lines (RAW264.7 and P388D1) and a control murine mammary sarcoma cell line (EMT-6). Cells were pretreated with interferon gamma (IFNgamma) and/or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) followed byBSA-ce6-mal addition, and SRA expression, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) release, conjugate uptake and PDT killing were measured. Both macrophage cell lines expressed SRA and took up conjugate specifically in an SRA-dependent manner, but differences were observed in their response to activation. RAW264.7 expressed increasingly more SRA and took up increasingly more BSA-ce6-mal in response to IFNgamma, LPS, and IFNgamma+LPS, respectively. The PDT killing did not follow the same pattern as the uptake of the photosensitizer. The increase in uptake in the IFNgamma treated cells did not lead to an increase in PDT killing, while stimulation with LPS or IFNgamma + LPS resulted in a significant protection against PDT, despite a significant increase in photosensitizer uptake. P388D1 was responsive to neither IFNgamma, nor to LPS, or to IFNgamma +LPS with respect to SRA expression, conjugate uptake, and PDT killing. These data may have implications for the use of PDT to target physiologically undesirable macrophage subtypes implicated in disease, and on how manipulation of the activation status of the macrophage will influence the PDT effect.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyAnimalsCattleCell LineCell Line, TumorInterferon-gammaLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalPhotosensitizing AgentsReceptors, ScavengerSerum Albumin, BovineTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaInterferon-gammaLipopolysaccharidesPhotosensitizing AgentsReceptors, ScavengerSerum Albumin, BovineTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID16164823
PMCPMC3071040
OpenAlexW2286718432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.