Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16160834›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2005

Characterization of a pollen-preferential gene, BAN102, from Chinese cabbage.

B S Park, J S Kim, S H Kim, Y D Park

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B S ParkBrassica Genomics Team, National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, Rural Development Administration, Suwon 441-701, Korea.
J S Kim
S H Kim
Y D Park

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We isolated and characterized a pollen-preferential gene, BAN102, from Chinese cabbage and analyzed the activity of its promoter. There were three or four copies of the BAN102 gene in the Chinese cabbage genome that specifically expressed in pollen and pollen tube. There were 2137 bp of BAN102 genomic clone comprising 186 bp of protein coding region, and 1178 bp of 5' and 773 bp of 3' non-coding regions. TATA box were located at 1071 nt of the promoter region while the polyadenylation signal and polyadenylation site were at 1470 and 1486 nt of the 3' non-coding region. BLAST search of BAN102 sequence showed that coding region of BAN102 gene was the greatest percent similarity with arabinogalactan protein (AGP23) gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Promoter analysis using GUS gene as a reporter showed that the pollen-specificity of BAN102 resided within the -112 to -44 bp of proximal promoter from the transient expression in tobacco and Chinese cabbage plants.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBlotting, SouthernBrassicaCloning, MolecularDNA, ComplementaryGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenes, ReporterGene Transfer TechniquesGenome, PlantMolecular Sequence DataNicotianaOrgan SpecificityPlants, Genetically ModifiedDNA, ComplementaryRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.