Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16160696›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2005

Systematic review of the relationship between family history and lung cancer risk.

A Matakidou, T Eisen, R S Houlston

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 109 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02519972 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer in Relatives With Family History of Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaichung Veterans General HospitalRan2007 to 2011Enrolled1,102ConditionsLung CancerArmslow dose computed tomography
NCT02611570 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Low Dose Computed Tomography Screening Study in Non-smokers with Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in Taiwan

TypeobservationalSponsorAcademia Sinica, TaiwanRan2014 to 2028Enrolled12,000ConditionsLung CancerArmsLDCT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Lung Cancer Screening, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Evaluating the association of polymorphisms in the HAP1 gene with lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Quantitative assessment of common genetic variants on chromosome 5p15 and lung cancer risk.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  9. Increased lung cancer risk associated with the TERT rs2736100 polymorphism: an updated meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Quantitative assessment of the influence of common variations (rs8034191 and rs1051730) at 15q25 and lung cancer risk.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  11. Lung cancer screening.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2012
    Guideline
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A MatakidouSection of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK. athenam@icr.ac.uk
T Eisen
R S Houlston

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic review of 28 case-control, 17 cohort and seven twin studies of the relationship between family history and risk of lung cancer and a meta-analysis of risk estimates. Data from both case-control and cohort studies show a significantly increased lung cancer risk associated with having an affected relative. Risk appears to be greater in relatives of cases diagnosed at a young age and in those with multiple affected family members. Increased lung cancer risk was observed in association with an affected spouse and twin studies, while limited, favour shared environmental exposures. The limitations of the currently published epidemiological studies to infer genetic susceptibility are discussed.

Indexed as

FamilyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEnvironmental ExposureHumansLung NeoplasmsRisk FactorsTwin Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID16160696
PMCPMC2361640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.