ArticlePlant molecular biology2005
Comparison of transcript profiling on Arabidopsis microarray platform technologies.
Article in Plant molecular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to chewing and sucking insect herbivores.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Article
- Roles for jasmonate- and ethylene-induced transcription factors in the ability of Arabidopsis to respond differentially to damage caused by two insect herbivores.Frontiers in plant science · 2014Article
- The Rice Oligonucleotide Array Database: an atlas of rice gene expression.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2012Article
- Comparative genomic analysis of NAC transcriptional factors to dissect the regulatory mechanisms for cell wall biosynthesis.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Article
- Transcriptional profiles underlying parent-of-origin effects in seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC plant biology · 2010Article
- Phytoremediation and phytosensing of chemical contaminants, RDX and TNT: identification of the required target genes.Functional & integrative genomics · 2009Article
- Measuring global gene expression in polyploidy; a cautionary note from allohexaploid wheat.Functional & integrative genomics · 2007Article
- Review of the literature examining the correlation among DNA microarray technologies.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2007Review
- Detection of transcriptional difference of porcine imprinted genes using different microarray platforms.BMC genomics · 2006Article
- An open-access long oligonucleotide microarray resource for analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes.Nucleic acids research · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date there have been few systematic studies comparing the results of transcript profiling from different microarray platform technologies. We evaluated in detail two different Arabidopsis thaliana microarray platforms: our own Genomic Amplicon arrays and the Qiagen long oligonucleotide arrays designed by Operon; furthermore, we cross-validated these arrays against the Affymetrix AG and ATH1 GeneChips. Data were obtained from all three platforms in each of two separate experiments; (1) at 2 h and (2) 8 h following a salicylic acid treatment applied to both wild-type and npr1-3 mutant plants. A total of 20 hybridizations were performed, analyzing the expression of 26,814 unique locus IDs. We demonstrate that intensity rank is a key variable that affects both inter-platform and cross-platform reproducibility. Although general agreement between platform technologies is low, data derived from high signal intensities (90th percentile) can correlate as well between differing platforms as replicates within the same platform (r=0.4-0.7). We also show that the identification of differentially expressed genes by significance analysis of microarrays is influenced by signal intensity and that overlap between significant gene lists from different platform technologies was as high as 67% when low intensity values were removed. Validation of 41 genes by Northern blot hybridization showed that all platform technologies performed well, qualitatively confirming 83-100% of differential gene expression. Our results suggest that the potential for the broad integration of microarray data from different platforms and laboratories is promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16158238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.