Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16157669›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Diverse functions of spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Jewel A Daniel, Brice E Keyes, Yvonne P Y Ng, C Onyi Freeman, Daniel J Burke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cyclin-dependent kinases: Masters of the eukaryotic universe.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structural plasticity of the living kinetochore.The Journal of cell biology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jewel A DanielDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA.
Brice E Keyes
Yvonne P Y Ng
C Onyi Freeman
Daniel J Burke
University of Virginia Medical Center · US

Funding

GENETIC CONTROL OF MITOTIC SPINDLE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTIONR01GM040334 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI BURKE, DANIEL J · 1993 to 2005
$1.4M
Identifying Inhibitors of the APC/C Using Yeast MutantsR01CA099036 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI BURKE, DANIEL J · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
Analysis of kinetochore assembly in S. cerevisiaeF31GM065070 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI DANIEL, JEWEL A · 2001 to 2003
$70k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099036NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 99036NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM065070NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM 65070NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM040334NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM40334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint regulates the metaphase-to-anaphase transition from yeast to humans. We examined the genetic interactions with four spindle assembly checkpoint genes to identify nonessential genes involved in chromosome segregation, to identify the individual roles of the spindle assembly checkpoint genes within the checkpoint, and to reveal potential complexity that may exist. We used synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis using spindle assembly checkpoint mutants mad1, mad2, mad3, and bub3. We found 228 synthetic interactions with the four spindle assembly checkpoint mutants with substantial overlap in the spectrum of interactions between mad1, mad2, and bub3. In contrast, there were many synthetic interactions that were common to mad1, mad2, and bub3 that were not shared by mad3. We found shared interactions between pairs of spindle assembly checkpoint mutants, suggesting additional complexity within the checkpoint and unique interactions for all of the spindle assembly checkpoint genes. We show that most genes in the interaction network, including ones with unique interactions, affect chromosome transmission or microtubule function, suggesting that the complexity of interactions reflects diverse roles for the checkpoint genes within the checkpoint. Our analysis expands our understanding of the spindle assembly checkpoint and identifies new candidate genes with possible roles in chromosome transmission and mitotic spindle function.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsChromosome SegregationChromosomes, FungalFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalMad2 ProteinsMicrotubulesMitosisNeural Networks, ComputerNuclear ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhosphorylationProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBub1 spindle checkpoint proteinCell Cycle ProteinsFungal ProteinsMAD1 protein, S cerevisiaeMad2 ProteinsMAD2 protein, S cerevisiaeMAD3 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16157669
PMCPMC1456180
OpenAlexW2167775737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.