Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16157072›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2005

Treatment of resistant hypertension.

Sandra J Taler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Renal Denervation: a Field in Flux.Current hypertension reports · 2016
    Review
  2. Clinical approach in treatment of resistant hypertension.Integrated blood pressure control · 2009
    Article
  3. Evaluation and treatment of resistant or difficult-to-control hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra J TalerDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. taler.sandra@mayo.edu
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the true prevalence of resistant hypertension is not known, it is likely that this condition will become increasingly common, driven by an aging population, obesity, nonadherence trends, and effects of target-organ disease. Current approaches focus on two goals: evaluation and correction of contributing causes, then selection of an effective drug regimen. Lifestyle factors contribute to resistance, particularly high sodium intake and weight gain. Secondary causes should be considered and corrected if feasible. Recent efforts have focused on the development of clinical pathways to guide treatment, based on plasma renin activity, aldosterone production, or hemodynamic measurements. The components of drug combinations beyond the second agent remain empiric. Although volume expansion plays a key role in drug resistance, clinical assessment of volume status is often difficult, frustrating efforts to achieve blood pressure control. Determination of the most effective approaches will require clinical trials using combination therapy.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAldosteroneAlgorithmsAntihypertensive AgentsHemodynamicsHumansHypertensionReninAldosteroneAntihypertensive AgentsRenin

Identifiers

PMID16157072
OpenAlexW1966027288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.