Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16155723›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2006

Isolation and culture of microvascular endothelial cells from gliomas of different WHO grades.

Sabine Miebach, Stefan Grau, Vera Hummel, Peter Rieckmann, Joerg-Christian Tonn, Roland Helmut Goldbrunner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. β-Estradiol 17-acetate enhances theNeural regeneration research · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Axitinib sensitization of high Single Dose Radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2014
    Article
  17. Tumor endothelial cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2012
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine MiebachDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Stefan Grau
Vera Hummel
Peter Rieckmann
Joerg-Christian Tonn
Roland Helmut Goldbrunner
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common intrinsic brain tumors. The degree of vascularization corresponds to malignancy and is related to prognosis. In order to retrieve information about tumor behavior in situ, the use of primary tissue material for experiments is advantageous. With increasing evidence for the importance of microenvironment and vascularization in tumor biology, we concentrated on the isolation of endothelial cells (EC) from primary tumor material to investigate the role of endothelium within tumor tissue. We developed a method for isolation and purification of tumor-derived endothelial cells. EC were isolated and cultivated from normal brain using tissue digestion and Percoll density gradient centrifugation resulting in a <95% of EC culture. For isolation of EC from gliomas of different malignancy grades a combination of tissue digestion, Percoll gradient centrifugation and magnetic bead sorting by anti-CD31, -VE-Cadherin and -CD 105 was employed. This approach provided a purity of <98%. Cells were classified and characterized by testing expression of CD105, CD31, VE-Cadherin, vWF, UEA-1 and measuring DiI-Ac-LDL-uptake. To exclude contamination, staining and negative selection with anti-SMA, -GFAP, and -CD68 was performed. Tumors were histopathologically diagnosed according to WHO classification. We isolated EC from normal brain (NBEC, n = 11), low-grade gliomas WHO II (LGEC, n = 22), and high-grade gliomas WHO III & IV (HGEC, n = 11). There were no clear differences in EC morphology between the different tumor grades. However, a significantly higher proliferation rate of HGEC compared to LGEC was observed as well as distinctive antigen expression. Already in early passages isolated EC showed a rapid change in antigen expression indicating a phenotypic shift under culture conditions. We could establish a protocol for reliable and reproducible isolation and culture of EC from gliomas with different WHO grading. In first phenotypical and functional analyses, NBEC, LGEC and HGEC show remarkable differences. EC from all tumors could be grown in culture. However, passage related changes of EC phenotype demand very early passages to work with.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesCell SurvivalEndothelial CellsGliomaHumansImmunomagnetic SeparationNeovascularization, PathologicPhenotypeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID16155723
OpenAlexW1968354884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.