Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16151692›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2005

A comprehensive SNP-based genetic analysis of inbred mouse strains.

Shirley Tsang, Zhonghe Sun, Brian Luke, Claudia Stewart, Nicole Lum, Melissa Gregory, Xiaolin Wu, Marianne Subleski, Nancy A Jenkins, Neal G Copeland and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-read RNA sequencing reveals allele-specific NbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A New Understanding of the Role of IL-1 in Age-Related Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in a Murine Model.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mouse cell line authentication.Cytotechnology · 2014
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shirley TsangLaboratory of Molecular Technology, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., National Cancer Institute at Frederick, 915 Tollhouse Avenue, Suite 211, Frederick, Maryland 21701, USA.
Zhonghe Sun
Brian Luke
Claudia Stewart
Nicole Lum
Melissa Gregory
Xiaolin Wu
Marianne Subleski
Nancy A Jenkins
Neal G Copeland
David J Munroe
Science Applications International Corporation (United States) · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

PHS HHS N01-C0-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dense genetic maps of mammalian genomes facilitate a variety of biological studies including the mapping of polygenic traits, positional cloning of monogenic traits, mapping of quantitative or qualitative trait loci, marker association, allelic imbalance, speed congenic construction, and evolutionary or phylogenetic comparison. In particular, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have proved useful because of their abundance and compatibility with multiple high-throughput technology platforms. SNP genotyping is especially suited for the genetic analysis of model organisms such as the mouse because biallelic markers remain fully informative when used to characterize crosses between inbred strains. Here we report the mapping and genotyping of 673 SNPs (including 519 novel SNPs) in 55 of the most commonly used mouse strains. These data have allowed us to construct a phylogenetic tree that correlates and expands known genealogical relationships and clarifies the origin of strains previously having an uncertain ancestry. All 55 inbred strains are distinguishable genetically using this SNP panel. Our data reveal an uneven SNP distribution consistent with a mosaic pattern of inheritance and provide some insight into the changing dynamics of the physical architecture of the genome. Furthermore, these data represent a valuable resource for the selection of markers and the design of experiments that require the genetic distinction of any pair of mouse inbred strains such as the generation of congenic mice, positional cloning, and the mapping of quantitative or qualitative trait loci.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsChromosome MappingCluster AnalysisGenomeGenomicsGenotypeMiceMice, Inbred StrainsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID16151692
OpenAlexW2045210704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.