Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16151477›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2006

Comparison of recombinant adenovirus and synthetic peptide for DC-based melanoma vaccination.

J Steitz, D Tormo, D Schweichel, T Tüting

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SteitzDepartment of Dermatology, Laboratory of Experimental Dermatology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
D Tormo
D Schweichel
T Tüting
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal strategies for antigen-specific melanoma vaccination are currently being defined in experimental mouse models. Using a single H2-K(b)-binding peptide epitope derived from the melanosomal enzyme tyrosinase-related protein 2 (TRP2) in C57BL/6 mice, we show that adenovirus-transduced dendritic cells (DC) are clearly superior to peptide-pulsed DC for the induction of CD8+ T cells and antimelanoma immunity. Vaccine efficacy strictly depended on the presence of linked CD4+ T-cell help during the priming but not the effector phase of the immune response. These results provide important information for the translation of melanoma vaccine strategy in future clinical applications.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdenoviridaeAnimalsCancer VaccinesCD4 AntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDendritic CellsDNA, RecombinantGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntramolecular OxidoreductasesLung NeoplasmsMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPeptide FragmentsCancer VaccinesCD4 AntigensDNA, Recombinantdopachrome isomeraseenhanced green fluorescent proteinGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntramolecular OxidoreductasesPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID16151477
OpenAlexW2004594163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.