Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16151149›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005

Survival of Campylobacter jejuni in waterborne protozoa.

W J Snelling, J P McKenna, D M Lecky, J S G Dooley

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Factors ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Survival ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Waterborne Isolates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Strain-Specific Differences in Survival ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Responses ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W J SnellingSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine Campus, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA.
J P McKenna
D M Lecky
J S G Dooley
University of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The failure to reduce the Campylobacter contamination of intensively reared poultry may be partially due to Campylobacter resisting disinfection in water after their internalization by waterborne protozoa. Campylobacter jejuni and a variety of waterborne protozoa, including ciliates, flagellates, and alveolates, were detected in the drinking water of intensively reared poultry by a combination of culture and molecular techniques. An in vitro assay showed that C. jejuni remained viable when internalized by Tetrahymena pyriformis and Acanthamoeba castellanii for significantly longer (up to 36 h) than when they were in purely a planktonic state. The internalized Campylobacter were also significantly more resistant to disinfection than planktonic organisms. Collectively, our results strongly suggest that protozoa in broiler drinking water systems can delay the decline of Campylobacter viability and increase Campylobacter disinfection resistance, thus increasing the potential of Campylobacter to colonize broilers.

Indexed as

Disease ReservoirsAcanthamoeba castellaniiAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBase SequenceCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniChickensCulture MediaFecesFresh WaterMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesTetrahymena pyriformisWater SupplyCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID16151149
PMCPMC1214634
OpenAlexW2169966980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.