Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16150771›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Women doctors and their careers: what now?

Isobel Allen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Responsive policies needed to secure rural supply from increasing female doctors: A perspective.The International journal of health planning and management · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The road to consultancy: an epidemiological study.Irish journal of medical science · 2021
    Article
  7. Joint ESCMID, FEMS, IDSA, ISID and SSI position paper on the fair handling of career breaks among physicians and scientists when assessing eligibility for early-career awards.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  8. A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How are trainees in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases supervised in Europe? An international cross-sectional questionnaire survey by the Trainee Association of ESCMID.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Personal life and working conditions of trainees and young specialists in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases in Europe: a questionnaire survey.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Isobel AllenPolicy Studies Institute, University of Westminster, London NW1 3SR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceCareer MobilityPhysicians, WomenConsultantsEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMedical Staff, HospitalMedicineOrganizational CultureProfessional PracticeSchool Admission CriteriaSchools, MedicalSpecialization

Identifiers

PMID16150771
PMCPMC1200597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.