Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16148308›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2005

Replication termination in Escherichia coli: structure and antihelicase activity of the Tus-Ter complex.

Cameron Neylon, Andrew V Kralicek, Thomas M Hill, Nicholas E Dixon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of Unidirectional Replication Forks in the Mouse Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Delineation of the Ancestral Tus-Dependent Replication Fork Trap.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Physiology of Highly RadioresistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Cameron NeylonSchool of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom. D.C.Neylon@soton.ac.uk
Andrew V Kralicek
Thomas M Hill
Nicholas E Dixon
AgResearch · NZAustralian National University · AUUniversity of North Dakota · USUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrest of DNA replication in Escherichia coli is triggered by the encounter of a replisome with a Tus protein-Ter DNA complex. A replication fork can pass through a Tus-Ter complex when traveling in one direction but not the other, and the chromosomal Ter sites are oriented so replication forks can enter, but not exit, the terminus region. The Tus-Ter complex acts by blocking the action of the replicative DnaB helicase, but details of the mechanism are uncertain. One proposed mechanism involves a specific interaction between Tus-Ter and the helicase that prevents further DNA unwinding, while another is that the Tus-Ter complex itself is sufficient to block the helicase in a polar manner, without the need for specific protein-protein interactions. This review integrates three decades of experimental information on the action of the Tus-Ter complex with information available from the Tus-TerA crystal structure. We conclude that while it is possible to explain polar fork arrest by a mechanism involving only the Tus-Ter interaction, there are also strong indications of a role for specific Tus-DnaB interactions. The evidence suggests, therefore, that the termination system is more subtle and complex than may have been assumed. We describe some further experiments and insights that may assist in unraveling the details of this fascinating process.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataReplication OriginSequence AlignmentTerminator Regions, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesDNA replication terminus site-binding protein, E coliEscherichia coli Proteinstus protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID16148308
PMCPMC1197808
OpenAlexW2109550125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.