Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1614820›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1992

Desensitization of acetylcholine receptors in BC3H-1 cells.

J P Dilger, Y Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pathways for nicotinic receptor desensitization.The Journal of general physiology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Unraveling mechanisms underlying partial agonism in 5-HT3A receptors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J P DilgerDepartment of Anesthesiology, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794-8480.
Y Liu
State University of New York · US

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS GM42095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor channels in the clonal BC3H-1 cell line. We measured the current response to rapid perfusion of outside-out patches with 1 microM to 5 mM ACh, carbamylcholine and suberyldicholine. After binding to the receptors and opening the ion channels, all agonists induce a rapid, concentration-dependent decay of channel activity. The time constant of the current decay ranged from several seconds at low agonist concentrations to about 50 ms at saturating concentrations. The decay rate at saturating concentrations was independent of voltage. The ratio of steady-state to peak current ranged from 0.5 at low agonist concentrations to 0.02 or less at high concentrations. The rate of recovery from desensitization after removal of agonist was also measured. For ACh, the recovery time constant was 320 ms; recovery from desensitization by carbamylcholine was twice as fast. A linear kinetic results. The data are consistent with a cyclic model, although, it is not possible to uniquely determine all of the rate constants in this scheme. The results are compared with competitive binding and single channel studies of desensitization in BC3H-1 cells.

Indexed as

CarbacholCells, CulturedCholineReceptors, CholinergicCarbacholCholineReceptors, Cholinergicsubecholine

Identifiers

PMID1614820
OpenAlexW2016053439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.