Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16147537›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2005

Induction of transplantation tolerance in non-human primate preclinical models.

Douglas A Hale, Kiran Dhanireddy, David Bruno, Allan D Kirk

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Introduction: immunoregulation: harnessing T cell biology for therapeutic benefit.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2005
    Article
  8. Clinical transplantation: current problems, possible solutions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas A HaleDigestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes, NIH, Transplantation Branch, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. douglash@intra.niddk.nih.gov
Kiran Dhanireddy
David Bruno
Allan D Kirk
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · US

Funding

Methods For Inducing Solid Organ Transplant ToleranceZ01DK062007 · NIDDK · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · PI KIRK, ALLAN DOUGLAS · 2002 to 2007
$2.1M
Bone Marrow Conditioning In Solid Organ TransplantationZ01DK062006 · NIDDK · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · PI HALE, DOUGLAS · 2001 to 2005
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short-term outcomes following organ transplantation have improved considerably since the availability of cyclosporine ushered in the modern era of immunosuppression. In spite of this, many of the current limitations to progress in the field are directly related to the existing practice of relatively non-specific immunosuppression. These include increased risks of opportunistic infection and cancer, and toxicity associated with long-term immunosuppressive drug exposure. In addition, long-term graft loss continues to result in part from a failure to adequately control the anti-donor immune response. The development of a safe and reliable means of inducing tolerance would ameliorate these issues and improve the lives of transplant recipients, yet given the improving clinical standard of care, the translation of new therapies has become appropriately more cautious and dependent on increasingly predictive preclinical models. While convenient and easy to use, rodent tolerance models have not to date been reliably capable of predicting a therapy's potential efficacy in humans. Non-human primates possess an immune system that more closely approximates that found in humans, and have served as a more rigorous preclinical testing ground for novel therapies. Prior to clinical adaptation therefore, tolerance regimens should be vetted in non-human primates to ensure that there is sufficient potential for efficacy to justify the risk of its application.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalModels, ImmunologicalAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntilymphocyte SerumImmunosuppression TherapyPrimatesSignal TransductionTransplantation ChimeraTransplantation ToleranceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntilymphocyte Serum

Identifiers

PMID16147537
PMCPMC1569541
OpenAlexW2148421255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.