Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16147515›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2005

The Ferrier Lecture 1995 behind the seen: the functional specialization of the brain in space and time.

Semir Zeki

Abstract readLecture
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The evolution of brain architectures for predictive coding and active inference.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Stochastic Chaos and Markov Blankets.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Neural and phenotypic representation under the free-energy principle.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  5. Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neural pathways for visual speech perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2014
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Life as we know it.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Learning to see words.Annual review of psychology · 2012
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Semir ZekiWellcome Laboratory of Neurobiology, University College London, UK. zeki.pa@ucl.ac.uk

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual brain consists of many different visual areas, which are functionally specialized to process and perceive different attributes of the visual scene. However, the time taken to process different attributes varies; consequently, we see some attributes before others. It follows that there is a perceptual asynchrony and hierarchy in visual perception. Because perceiving an attribute is tantamount to becoming conscious of it, it follows that we become conscious of different attributes at different times. Visual consciousness is therefore distributed in time. Given that we become conscious of different visual attributes because of activity at different, functionally specialized, areas of the visual brain, it follows that visual consciousness is also distributed in space. Therefore, visual consciousness is not a single unified entity, but consists of many microconsciousnesses.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsColor PerceptionConsciousnessHumansPrimatesVisual CortexVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID16147515
PMCPMC1609195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.