Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16145144›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Use of rapid dipstick and latex agglutination tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serodiagnosis of amebic liver abscess, amebic Colitis, and Entamoeba histolytica Cyst Passage.

H Rogier van Doorn, Henk Hofwegen, Rob Koelewijn, Henk Gilis, Ron Peek, Jose C F M Wetsteyn, Perry J J van Genderen, Tony Vervoort, Tom van Gool

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Accurate laboratory diagnosis of human intestinal and extra-intestinal amoebiasis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Aptamer-based approaches for the detection of waterborne pathogens.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Update on laboratory diagnosis of amoebiasis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Diagnosis of Intestinal Parasitic Protozoa, with a Focus on Entamoeba histolytica.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2009
    Article
  11. Laboratory diagnostic techniques for Entamoeba species.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2007
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H Rogier van DoornSection of Parasitology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk Hofwegen
Rob Koelewijn
Henk Gilis
Ron Peek
Jose C F M Wetsteyn
Perry J J van Genderen
Tony Vervoort
Tom van Gool
Academic Medical Center · NLInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A homemade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a dipstick assay (Dipstick) for the detection of anti-Entamoeba histolytica antibodies in serum were developed and evaluated together with a commercially available latex agglutination test (LAT; Laboratoires Fumouze) for their use in serodiagnosis of amebiasis. The sensitivity of these assays was evaluated with sera from 27 patients with radiologically proven, cellulose acetate precipitation (CAP) test-positive amebic liver abscess, 7 patients with parasitologically and PCR-proven amebic colitis, and 11 patients with parasitologically and PCR-proven E. histolytica cyst passage. The sensitivities of the ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT were all 93.3% (42/45). With a combination of Dipstick and LAT, all abscess and colitis patients had at least one positive result. The specificity was assessed with 238 sera from patients with various parasitic, bacterial, viral, and fungal infectious diseases, sera containing autoimmune antibodies, and sera from healthy blood donors. The specificities of the ELISA, Dipstick, and LAT were 97.1%, 98.1%, and 99.5%, respectively. Of 61 sera from patients with PCR-proven E. dispar infection, 60 (98.4%) were negative in both Dipstick and LAT and 59 (96.7%) were negative in ELISA. Our data suggest that all three assays are sensitive serological tests. The rapid LAT and Dipstick provide fast results and can easily be applied in routine laboratories in order to facilitate the diagnosis of amebiasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanDysentery, AmebicEntamoeba histolyticaEntamoebiasisEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansLatex Fixation TestsLiver Abscess, AmebicReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsTime FactorsAntibodies, ProtozoanReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID16145144
PMCPMC1234111
OpenAlexW2091922870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.