Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16143842›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2004

Chloroplast RNA processing and stability.

David L Herrin, Jöerg Nickelsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Organization and expression of organellar genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Post-transcriptional control of chloroplast gene expression.Gene regulation and systems biology · 2009
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David L HerrinSection of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A6700, Austin, TX, 78712, USA, herrin@mail.utexas.edu.
Jöerg Nickelsen
Ruhr University Bochum · DEThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary chloroplast transcripts are processed in a number of ways, including intron splicing, internal cleavage of polycistronic RNAs, and endonucleolytic or exonucleolytic cleavages at the transcript termini. All chloroplast RNAs are also subject to degradation, although a curious feature of many chloroplast mRNAs is their relative longevity. Some of these processes, e.g., psbA splicing and stability of a number of chloroplast mRNAs, are regulated in response to light-dark cycles or nutrient availability. This review highlights recent advances in our understanding of these processes in the model organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, focusing on results since the extensive reviews published in 1998 [Herrin DL et al. 1998 (pp. 183-195), Nickelsen Y 1998 (pp. 151-163), Stern DB and Drager RG 1998 (pp. 164-182), in Rochaix JD et al. (eds) The Molecular Biology of Chloroplasts and Mitochondria in Chlamydomonas. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands]. We also allude to studies with other organisms, and to the potential impact of the Chlamydomonas genome project where appropriate.

Identifiers

PMID16143842
OpenAlexW2117665190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.