Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16143512›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2005

Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology.

Ivet Bahar, A J Rader

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 273 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bridging Scales: Coarse-Grained Protein Models in Computational Biology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. On the emergence of metabolism: the evolution of proteins that powered life.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Knot data analysis using multiscale Gauss link integral.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Reused Protein Segments Linked to Functional Dynamics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ivet BaharDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Pittsburgh, W1043 Biomedical Science Tower, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. bahar@ccbb.pitt.edu
A J Rader

Funding

Multiscale Dynamics of Cell Cycle Control and ApoptosisP20GM065805 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2003 to 2005
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM065805NIGMS NIH HHS P20-GM065805-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The realization that experimentally observed functional motions of proteins can be predicted by coarse-grained normal mode analysis has renewed interest in applications to structural biology. Notable applications include the prediction of biologically relevant motions of proteins and supramolecular structures driven by their structure-encoded collective dynamics; the refinement of low-resolution structures, including those determined by cryo-electron microscopy; and the identification of conserved dynamic patterns and mechanically key regions within protein families. Additionally, hybrid methods that couple atomic simulations with deformations derived from coarse-grained normal mode analysis are able to sample collective motions beyond the range of conventional molecular dynamics simulations. Such applications have provided great insight into the underlying principles linking protein structures to their dynamics and their dynamics to their functions.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCryoelectron MicroscopyModels, MolecularProtein ConformationBinding SitesChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Crystallography, X-RayProtein BindingChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60

Identifiers

PMID16143512
PMCPMC1482533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.